Why is Swiss People's Party (SVP) happy if Switzerland becomes a target of hate campaigns?

The popular initiative to ban minaret construction in Switzerland will most probably win the majority of Swiss voters on this Sunday, 29 November 2009, with the exception of liberal cantons like Basel and Geneva). By imposing a nation-wide ban for the construction of minarets, it is a logical step in the strategical objective of the party: to turn back Switzerland from a modern, liberal,multiethnic, tolerant country back into a extremely nationalist, reactionary, intolerant, xenophobic nation. To achieve this ultimate objective of the party, it is very important that Switzerland becomes the target of hate campaigns from outside. This would be helpful to create a climate of fear and intolerance and to unite the citizens under an authoritarian political regime.
Swiss People's Party greatest satisfaction would be an terror attack of the Nine Eleven type on this country, and if such an attack is not imminent, SVP politics are consciously designed to provoke just that. While Swiss People's Party tries to convince our citizens that it is the only political group acting in the general interest of the country, and likes to accuse opponents of high treason, the question might be justified if the Swiss People's Party is not itself a major agent of hight treason against the general interest of our country.

In memoriam Sergei Magnitski - and a hommage to Fyodor Dostoyevsky and to Leos Janacek


When back in 1862 Fyodor Dostoyevsky published "The House of the Dead" (Russian: Записки из Мёртвого дома, German: "Aufzeichnungen aus einem Totenhaus"), an account of his years as detainee in a Siberian prison camp, he probably did so hoping that some day in the future, the horrors he described would come to an end in Russia.
His description of the far worse conditions under which prisoners in custody are hold in comparison to those already convicted, are echoed, 147 years later, in the wording of a report by Markus Ackeret (Neue Zürcher Zeitung Nr.275, Thursday November 26, 2009, p.5) on the Case of Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitski: "Die Zustände in den Untersuchungsgefängnissen gelten als bedeutend schlimmer als in den Strafkolonien. Besonders berüchtigt ist das Butyrka Gefängnis in Moskau..."

The libretto of Leos Janacek's opera "Z mrtvého domu" ("Aus einem Totenhaus")written in 1927 is a collage of citations from Dostoyevsky's original text. Under the direction of Calixto Bieito on the opera program of Theater Basel 2009/2010, the opera is put into the context of the continuity of inhumane criminal punishment throughout the 19th and the 20th century to this day.
And, in a surprising way,Janacek, Calixto Bieito and the fantastic musical performers at Theater Basel can be seen as a bow before the latest victims of Russian criminal justice which seems to be unable so far to overcome a terrible tradition. President Medvedev, who, in an act of personal courage, has ordered an investigation on the case of Sergei Magnitski, should be graciously asked to invite Calixto Bieito and the Theater Basel to show Janacek's opera in Moscow.


Foto Copyright Hans-Jörg Michel and Theater Basel

Swissness as the Swiss People's Party defines it

banning minarets, walling the country against immigration

The political megatrend in Switzerland, as demonstrated by the latest politician's rating published by Neue Zürcher Zeitung, shows a clear polarization towards the extreme poles on the left (social democrats SP and greens GP) and the extreme right (Swiss People's Party SVP/UDC). No wonder the climate is rapidly deteriorating, the political propaganda is becoming increasingly aggressive in style.
The popular initiative launched by SVP which aims at the country-wide prohibition of erecting minarets has unleashed an aggressivity unknown in Switzerland since the times of the Sonderbund war in 1847.(In Europe, the type of propaganda in use has been first seen in Germany during the Weimar Republic -1918 to 1933- with avantgarde artists like Heartfiled and Grosz on on the forefront, and was brought to perfection later by the propaganda machines of the Soviet Union and of Nazi Germany). This "Shock and Awe" propaganda style disappeared after World War II. It reemerged in the Sixties, and later has been used for commercial advertising (e.g. by BENETTON)
The latest victim of the SVP propaganda machine has been the Roman-Catholic bishop Kurt Koch who is accused of being a traitor after having declared his opposition to the initiative.
The term of "Landesverrat" (high treason) has become more and more fashionable lately inside of the SVP and is used every time a member of that party vocalizes the slightest dissension from the official party line.

One question arises from this political trend: is the SVP consciously trying to put this country on a path that could end in a either a reenactment of the German Democratic Republic which had to protect it's territorial integrity by a wall and an order to kill anybody willing to cross the border, or produce a copy of the wall the Israelis put up against the Palestinians?





The Swiss People's Party has given proof of exploiting xenophobic and racist tendencies since the arrival of Christoph Blocher at it's commands and continues to show a will to proceed to a political and ethnical homogenization of the country under the cover of protecting a liberal market economy, and it consciously takes the risk of triggering readiness for ethnical cleansing in the brains of modest citizens by it's propaganda methods.
The left has been surprisingly shy and has failed to come out massively against the minaret initiative, but on the other hand has tried to copy the SVP propaganda style by publishing a poster displaying a photography of Doris Leuthard, federal minister of the economy, with hand full of blood, as an illustration for the argument to ban export of weaponry from Switzerland, another popular initiative to be voted on november 27, 2009.
Meanwhile, the fact that posters of the minaret initiative have been banned from public advertising areas in some cantons has led to a well orchestrated outcry by the initiative committee over repression of free speech and censorship...

Poor Switzerland.

Will Roman Polanski get a fair trial?

Evidence has been growing during the last 48 hours that the accusations on which Roman Polanski's prosecution are based on are more severe than what could be assumed earlier. While the mediatic fog over the quality of the crime he is indicted for is passing away, a lot of questions arise: was it sex with a minor or was it rape? Under what circumstances did it occur? what was the role of the girl's mother in the process? Was she conscious of the danger she put her child in? Was her risk management sufficient? Was the act premeditated? What was his mental state before and during the crime? It will be extremely difficult to reconstruct the facts after such a long time, and it will be even more difficult to get back to where everything started: with the traumatic childhood and adolescence of a Jewish child during and after World War II, which has to be seen in direct connection with Nazi Germany's aggression of Poland.
Read Jerzy Kosinsky's (1933-1991) book "The Painted Bird" (L'oiseau bariolé, der bemalte Vogel) and you will understand the horrors that must have haunted the survivors of the Holocaust and of the life in occupied Poland, a country full of
open antisemitism not only during the war but even afterwards, during the communist regime. Or go to see Polanski's film "Repulsion of 1965...
The central question is:
If Roman Polanski is extradited to the United States, how fair will the trial be?
Finally, his trial will be the trial of the United States Judicial system, and if it ends in bringing not only justice but peace of mind to a man who suffered probably more than anyone of us can imagine throughout his life while putting on a mask of clown, then and only then this trial will be a success...

The Case Polanski: When a State of Law masturbates in public
The arrest of Roman Polanski on arriving at Zurich airport is an example of a perverted use of the law. If there had been a clear will to respect the law and to avoid an international scandal, the direction of the Zurich festival should have been warned beforehand that Mr. Polanski was persona non grata in Switzerland because of the still pending prosecution in the United States. The ambush organized to arrest Polanski was a full blow in the face of the Swiss federal culture authorities which depend of the Federal Department of the Interior during a period of transition between Mr. Couchepin and his successor Burkhalter.
From the purely theoretical point of view, the prosecution of child abuse independant of the standing of the person under suspicion might be the central point for our Justice minister, but the way Mrs. Widmer-Schlumpf's department handled the case Polanski merits only one remark:
"Pfui Teufel, Frau Bundesrätin..."

Post Scriptum:
Mr Polanski might have provoked legal action by trying to whitewash his past according to a report by The GUARDIAN on September 2009:




If it were so, my critique of Mrs. Widmer-Schlumpf's department would not be well founded and I should apologize to our Justice minister, but nevertheless, the handling of this affair by our federal authorities once again has not been at the level of quality requested in a country that is under constant attack from abroad.

Le révisionisme historique et la campagne de Suisse en 1799
Le révisionisme historique en vogue dans la Russie postmoderne de Medvedev
et Poutine n'a pas épargné la Suisse. Dans sa version online, la Moscow Times confirme que le Maréchal Souvorov, par son intervention, aurait chassé les Français de la Suisse et contribué au rétablissement de la neutralité de notre pays. Cela est trop beau pour être vrai, et à celles et ceux qui aimeraient savoir mieux comment la campagne militaire de 1799 s'est déroulée, Osservatore Profano recommande la lecture du livre de Nicole GOTTERI: La campagne de Suisse en 1799 "Le choc des géants", paru chez Bernard Giovanangeli, Paris 2003 ISBN 2-909034-35-6.
En effet, il y a exactement 210 ans, le 26 septembre 1799, pendant que les troupes russes de Souvorov réussirent à franchir le Pont du Diable et d'avancer jusqu'à Altdorf, l'armée française commandée par le général Masséna prit d'assaut la ville de Zurich après le refus des forces austriaco-russes de convenir à une retraite en ordre.
Nicole Gotteri écrit, en page 124 de son livre:
"...pour essayer d'épargner à la Ville (de Zurich)les suites prévisible d'une prise d'assaut,Masséna crut devoir user de la voie des négotiations. Ce geste est tout à son honneur, contraitement à ce que Korsakov (commandant des forces alliées sur place), sans doute pour se justifier, insinua dans ses rapports au tsar et à Souvorov, lui-même ayant retenu le parlementaire français, le brigadier Ducheyron,
envoyé le 25 au soir au mépris des usages de guerre et ayant différé de donner une réponse..."
Il est très facile de comprendre que si aujourd'hui les historiens russes basent leur appréciation des évènements du 26 septembre 1799 exclusivement sur les archives
de l'empire du 18ème et 19ème siècle, ils arrivent facilement à une interprétation très diffèrente non seulement de la seconde bataille de Zurich et des raisons pour le carnage qui a sans doute eu lieu dans la ville lors de l'assaut des troupes françaises sur les troupes russes en complet désordre mais aussi de toute la campagne de Souvorov.
Souvorov lui-même, ce jour là, après avoir franchi le Saint-Gothard au coût de la vie de 2000 hommes, a en effet réussi a franchir la Schöllenen défendu ce jour la par des forces françaises en retraite tactique.
Nicole Gotteri:
"Le général en chef russe ignorait encore les résultats des batailles engagées sur le lac de Zurich. Il comptait toujours rejoindre Hotze (général autrichien d'origine suisse tué lors des combats dans la plaine de la Linth) à Schwytz et marcher sur Lucerne. Pour gagner Schwytz il renonça le sentier qui passait par Flüelen Sisikon et Brunner car il révélait son mouvement à Lecourbe (le général de division français à la tête des troupes dans la vallée de la Reuss, dans la haute vallée de l'Aare et dans le Haut Valais qui s'était replié à Seedorf sur la rive gauche de la Reuss).
Il préféra emprunter le Schächental, le col de Kinzig, le Wängital pour aboutir au hameau de Muotathal...."

Les suites sont connues. Souvorov sera refoulé du Muotothal, il devra passer dans le Linthtal d'où il essayera de passer vers le lac de Zurich, il sera repoussé vers Elm et franchira, dans la neige, avec ce qui reste de ses troupes durement éprouvées, ayant perdu pratiquement tous son matériel y inclus les vivres, le Panixerpass pour descendre dans la vallée du Rhin d'ou il retirera son armée du territoire suisse.
Nicole Gotteri:
D'après les estimations de l'historien russe Miliutin, les effectifs sous le commandement de Souvorov en date du 1er septembre avaient été 706 officiers et de 20579 hommes.... A l'arrivée à Coire, 8 octobre, 14000 hommes étaient encore présents; la perte totale se montait à environ 6000 hommes. En outre,Souvorov avait perdu toute son artillerie et tous ses bagages..."

Il y a lieu de mentionner à cette occasion la communication catastrophique entre les commandements suprèmes des troupes de coalition, notamment le tsar et l'empereur autrichien François, frère du commandant des troupes austro-russes en Suisse, le'archéduc Charles, et l'atmosphère glaciale, et en partie franchement hostile entre les commandants dans les terrain.
Le contrast avec l'habileté de conduite, l'usage des renseignements, l'esprit d'invention du génie militaire dans la préparation de passages fluviaux (Limmat, Linth) du côté français est frappant.

Finalement, il faut signaler que la campagne en Suisse de 1799 a été fratricide.
Du côté français, il y avait plusieurs bataillons helvétique, du côté de la coalition un régiment (Roverea) et des paysans en révolte contre les troupes d'occupation françaises.
Inutile de vouloir nier la rupture qui reignait dans notre pays en cette période sanglante, et dangereux de vouloir glorifier la coalition en dénigrant les troupes françaises. Une chose est sure: l'expérience des fureurs de la guerre sur notre territoire a permis aux Suisses de mieux réflêchir sur leur façon de gérer un pays
d'une extrème inhomogénéité culturelle, et a accepter l'acte de Médiation proposée par Napoléon en 1805. Les leçons de la campagne de 1799 étaient bien apprises en novembre 1847, lorsque sous la direction du général Dufour, le Sondrebond a été écrasé par une campagne militaire qui a été charactérisée par un historien américain, Joachim Remak, comme "une guerre très civile" (A Very Civil War) ou, dans le titre de la traduction allemande du livre: "Bruderzwist, nicht Bruderkrieg"

Général Claude Jacques Lecourbe (1758-1815)

Un cordiale benvenuto al Presidente Medvedev dal Osservatore Profano

Non c'è dubbio che il generale maresciallo di campo (russo ed austriaco) Suvorov, nel 1799 aveva la missione di preparare una base avanzata per l'attacco degli alleati contro la Francia rivoluzionaria, è che per la sua volontà di ferro e la crudeltà colla quale ha trattato i suoi soldati, ha mancato solo di poco l'obiettivo.
La memoria storica nazionale della Svizzera non è mai uscito dall scissione profonda che divide gli amici della Francia (e della sua rivoluzione), i Svizzeri (protestanti, liberali) del settore occidentale del paese, e quelli amici della Russia, i Svizzeri (cattolici, conservatori) del settore centrale ed orientale del paese.
11 anni fa, nel 1998, Basilea, si ricordava con una festa repubblicana del direttore elvetico Peter Ochs, fondatore della Repubblica Elvetica (1798 a 1805) mentre che nei Grigioni, un magazzino storico-geografico-tusristico (Terra Grischuna) implorava l'incendio del monastero di Disentis come un reato tipico dei Francesi atei.

Se il presidente russo Dmitri Medvedev, primo capo di Stato della Russia mai venuto in Svizzera, apportera il suo tributo davanti al monumento Suvorov nella Schöllenen, sara ben avisato di ricordarsi non solo dei trionfi del stratega Suvorov e delle sofferenze dei suoi uomini, ma anche della qualità dell' avversario di quest'ultimo e della bravura delle truppe francesi sotto il Comando del generale Claude Jacques Lecourbe, e del fatto che il colpo mortale che la Russia e l'Austria volevano portare alla Francia in Svizzera non è riuscita.

Facit: anche oggi, la Svizzera rimane un terreno minato per quello che prova di usarla come base avanzata di interessi strategici, perche grazie alla libertà dei suoi cittadini, i dissensi e le lotte interne lasciarono sempre dello spazio d'azione per l'avversario e impedirono il successo finale...

Riferimenti:
GÜNTHER Reinhold: Le Alpi a Ferro e Fuoco
La campagna della divisione Lecourbe nella guerra del 1799
Armando Dadò Editore, Locarno 2002
ISBN 88-8281-109-3


A hearty welcome to President Medvedev

Beyond any doubt the general field marshal Suvorov had
the mission, in 1799, to establisch an advanced base for the final attack of the Allied forces against revolutionary France, and that thanks to his iron will and the cruelty with which he treated his soldiers, only narrowly missed this objective.

The historical memory of the Swiss has never overcome the deep divide between the
friends of France (ans the French Revolution), namely the inhabitants of the
Western part of the country (protestant, liberal) and the friends of Russia, the inhabitants of the Eastern and central parts of the country (catholic and conservative).

Eleven years ago, in 1998, in Basel a "fête républicaine" was held in honour of the founder of the Helvetic Republic, Peter Ochs, while in Grisons, a historical-geographical-touristic magazine (Terra Grischuna) still deplored the firestorm that had destroyed the monastery of Disentis as a crime that had been typical for the impious French.

When the President of Russia, the first head of state of Russia ever to visit Switzerland, will honour the memory of the general field marshal at the Suvorov memorial in the canyon of the Schöllenen, he will be well advised to consider not only the triumphs of the strategic leader and the suffering of his soldiers, but also the bravery of the adversary,the French troops under the command of Général Claude Jacques Lecourbe (1758-1815, and to the fact that the mortal blow that was intended against the French on Swiss soil did not succeed.

Facit:
Even today, Switzerland remains a terrain full of landmines for all those who tries to use her as a base for strategic interests, thanks to the liberty of her citizens who through their dissensions and infights will impede the final success.

Source:

GÜNTHER Reinhold: Le Alpi a Ferro e Fuoco
La campagna della divisione Lecourbe nella guerra del 1799
Armando Dadò Editore, Locarno 2002
ISBN 88-8281-109-3